Advice on No-Exam vs. Fully Underwritten Life Insurance
What advice would you give someone considering a no-exam policy versus a traditional fully underwritten life insurance policy?
I'm currently looking into life insurance options, and it's all feeling a bit overwhelming. Could you explain the pros and cons of choosing a no-exam policy versus a traditional fully underwritten one? Also, how might things like my age, health, and financial goals affect this decision?
Answer
My advice would be to consider the cost, coverage and application process of both options before making a decision. No-exam policies may offer easier access to life insurance coverage. Still, they can be more expensive than traditional fully underwritten life insurance policies and typically provide less coverage for the same cost.
I have been able to find no-exam policies for clients with roughly a 2-5% premium in cost. Given most of the policies were $20–100/month, the premium paid for the benefit of not having to go through the medical exam process was worth it from a time-cost perspective.