Why doesn’t a higher life insurance premium always match the benefit increase?
Our study found that buying five times the death benefit for a 20-year term insurance policy costs twice as much premium. For example, $100,000 costs $151 per year, and $500,000 costs $298. Why doesn’t the premium increase match the coverage increase?
I recently came across a study that highlighted an interesting finding about term life insurance policies, specifically a 20-year term. The study showed that purchasing five times the death benefit only results in twice the amount of premium paid. For instance, a $100,000 policy costs $151 annually, while a $500,000 policy costs $298 per year. As someone exploring life insurance options, I'm curious to understand why the increase in premium does not directly correspond to the increase in coverage. Could you clarify why there is this disparity between the premium increase and the coverage increase?
Answer
Like so many other products in the US economy, life insurance pricing is not linear. Sometimes it pays to buy in bulk. There are many reasons for this situation. As stated previously, the pricing results from complex statistical analyses completed by insurance companies and their actuaries. Insurance companies are not giving a "bulk discount" out of generosity to their insured customers.
Insurance companies collect revenues in the form of insurance premiums, which they invest to earn interest. From these " revenue sources," they incur some consistent expenses, such as wages/salaries, overhead (utilities, rent, etc.), and marketing. These costs are relatively predictable and similar for any policy, whether it’s a $100,000 or $500,000 policy. Insurers then have an uncertain expense in the form of a payout when an insured member passes away.
The variable cost is whether the death benefit will occur. So the pricing scenario described in this question reflects a lower probability that the individuals with higher death benefits will occur as soon as those with lower death benefits do or that the forecast of interest earned on the additional premiums will be statistically sufficient to compensate for the potentially larger death benefits.